🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to ban social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Movement

Across Europe, a rising number of countries are exploring parallel bans.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that phones and networks are "stealing our kids' youth". A law is expected to be enacted next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to enact a bill raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding statement supporting a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is given. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a useful first step," commented the European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the government has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "supported by robust evidence".

Earlier, interest built behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. An organization established by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after encountering disturbing online content contends that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are secure and suitable for children," commented a prominent peer.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, regulation is largely happening at the regional level amid national inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation restricting minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed bills mandating parental consent for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from certain individuals to copy the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Apart from the West, additional states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, global agencies take a more measured stance. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The agency points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

While this international conversation continues, the steps of the Australian government and others show that policymakers around the world are no longer prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.